Do You Have an RFP Template for a 401(k) | 403(b) Plan Audit?

Authored on

Do You Have a Template for a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a 401(k)/403(b) Plan?

Almost every time I present an educational seminar, at least one attendee asks me if I have a template for a retirement plan audit RFP.

After discussing the importance of selecting a quality plan auditor and providing a list of what should be provided, requested, and the criteria that should be considered, I will provide an RFP outline of the items that make an effective RMD and then a template of an RFP that can be tailored to each plan’s specific needs.

Background

The sponsor of a retirement plan is the Plan Administrator charged with the responsibility of operating the plan in accordance with its terms and with the fiduciary duty of acting in the best interest of the plan participants. The Plan Administrator can delegate many of its administrative and operational responsibilities to another individual or entity, including a pooled plan provider, a third-party administrator, a recordkeeper, and/or an investment advisor, but it always retains the ultimate responsibility for their selection and for their actions. But that’s not all…

When large employee benefit plans require an audit, it is the Plan Administrator’s responsibility to hire an independent qualified public accountant (IQPA). Hiring an auditor is a fiduciary function, such that the Plan Administrator must exercise the same care and prudence in hiring a plan auditor as it does when selecting all the other plan service providers. Similar to other service providers, the Plan Administrator cannot fully delegate the responsibility over the plan’s financial statements to the plan auditor. In fact, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) holds Plan Administrators responsible for ensuring that plan financial statements are properly audited in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards (GAAS).

Historically, DOL studies of audit quality have found that over 90% of the nation’s auditors perform less than 25 audits, and those auditors have a deficiency rate above 65%. 6% of the nation’s auditors perform between 25 and 99 audits, and those auditors have a 42% deficiency rate. It means that if your auditor performs less than 100 audits, you have a 50-50 chance that your financial statements include deficiencies. About 750 firms nationwide perform more than 100 audits, and those firms have a 12% deficiency rate. If your audit firm performs 100 audits or more, the odds are in your favor that your audited financial statements do not contain deficiencies.

When a plan auditor is declared deficient by the DOL, the auditor can be sent to the ethics division of the corresponding Board of Accountancy, three years of previously accepted Forms 5500 can be rejected, and the audits have to be redone by a different accounting firm. Belfint, Lyons, & Shuman has performed re-audits when accountants for a takeover client were declared deficient. The DOL assesses penalties to the plan sponsor when the audit is deficient. Hiring a firm that lacks knowledge of the specialized nature of the industry and skills necessary to perform plan audits conflicts with the stated goal of ERISA to protect plan participants.

Are Plan Audits a Priority to the Prospective Audit Firm?

The RFP should ask whether the team performing your audit includes industry specialists, or whether the retirement plan audit is merely an add-on service that is a lower priority for an accounting firm that provides other services to your entity. There are many audit firms that have developed specialized retirement plan audit practices where the plan audit is not a secondary priority to the accounting firm.

The first step towards establishing whether the audit firm is committed to providing quality audits to ERISA plans is to determine whether the firm belongs to the AICPA Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center (EBPAQC). Members of the EBPAQC voluntarily adhere to higher standards of audit quality through their policies, procedures, and training related to the performance of benefit plan audits. The RFP should ask for a list of the industry-specific audit training that each one of the team members assigned to the audit has received.

The Request for Proposal (RFP) Process

An effective RFP will determine the quality of the respondents and will help reduce the time and effort expended in the overall RFP and selection process. In addition, the plan sponsor should provide audit firms with sufficient information about the nature of the plan and the engagement to allow them to make a meaningful and comprehensive proposal that addresses your specific needs and evaluation criteria.

The RFP should include:

  1. The name of the plan as it appears on the Form 5500.
  2. Details about the Plan such as:

Type of plan

  • Plan year end
  • Size of plan (number of participants, total assets)
  • Name of the auditor’s principal contact with the plan during the RFP process
  • Names of the service providers, as applicable: custodian(s), recordkeeper(s), investment advisor, third party administrator, ERISA attorney, actuary, trust arrangements (e.g., master trust investment arrangement)
  • Relevant Plan Provisions: the employer contribution formula, eligibility criteria, whether the plan has automatic enrollment, and whether it passes the discrimination test, distribution, loan, and hardship provisions.
  • Expected due dates for completion of each service to be rendered.
  • The dates when the audit package and payroll report can be available.
  • Objectives, expectations, and requirements of the audit engagement to be undertaken.

Scope of the engagement

Describe the services to be provided; the scope of the work and any special considerations, including:

  • Number of years that should be covered by the proposal
  • First year covered by the proposal
  • Whether the audit is a full scope audit or a 103(a)(3)(C) audit (formerly limited scope audit) in accordance with DOL Regulation 29 CFR2520.103-8
  • Types of investments held by the plan, whether there are any hard to value investments, and the respective custodians for each investment holding
  • Were there any changes in service providers during the year?
  • Whether any other services are expected of the CPA firm (such as preparation of Form 5500 or performance of payroll audits)
  • Whether the financial statements and auditor’s report will be part of an 11-K filing
  • Whether the CPA is expected to attend regular or special meetings with plan trustees, governance committees, or the plan administrator
  • Description of any plan changes or significant issues not described above (for example, unique accounting circumstances, consolidations needed, and known areas of difficulty such as hard-to-value investments, discovery of fraud)
Requested Content for the Proposal

The RFP should include questions that address what is important to the plan sponsor, such as:

  • The CPA Firm’s size, location, and history
  • Whether the firm is a member of the AICPA Employee Benefit Plan Audit Quality Center
  • Number of employee benefit plan (EBP) clients
  • Number of similar type plan audits
  • States in which the firm is licensed to practice
  • Firm references — especially from similar type plans — and specific contact information
  • Whether the firm has been the subject of any DOL findings or referrals, or any AICPA or State Society Ethics referrals
  • Whether the firm has insurance coverage (errors & omissions, workers’ compensation, etc.)
  • Information about the audit team that will be assigned to the audit
  • Partner in charge of the CPA firm’s employee benefit plan audit practice
  • Partner in charge of the audit
  • Expected levels of staffing and supervision
  • Prior EBP experience and training of the partner in charge and in-charge of the engagement and other key firm personnel pertinent to the engagement
  • Details of industry-specific EBP Continuing Education attended by supervisors and above assigned to the team
  • Other industry involvement
  • Client retention statistics
  • Turnover rate for EBP Personnel

Engagement information

  • Audit approach
  • A detailed fee schedule for each service to be rendered
  • Reports to be issued
  • Expected completion dates for each portion of the engagement
  • Expected level of staff assigned to the engagement
  • Biographies for the personnel assigned to the engagement
  • Information that is expected to be provided by the plan to the CPA
  • Fee structure for any additional services the plan sponsor may request
Proposal Evaluation and Auditor Selection

The following information should be considered during the proposal evaluation and selection process:

  • Federal law requires that an auditor engaged for an employee benefit plan audit be licensed or certified as a public accountant by a State regulatory authority. You may wish to verify with the appropriate State regulatory authority that the provider holds a valid, up-to-date license or certificate to perform auditing services.
  • Auditors of employee benefit plans should not have any financial interests in the plan or the plan sponsor that would affect their ability to render an objective, unbiased opinion about the financial condition of the plan.
  • One of the most common reasons for deficient accountants’ reports is the failure of the auditor to perform tests in areas unique to employee benefit plan audits. The more EBP-specific continuing professional education and experience that an auditor has with employee benefit plan audits, the more familiar the auditor will be with benefit plan practices and operations, as well as the special auditing issues unique to, and rules that apply to such plans.

The technical evaluation should provide a systematic framework for selecting an auditor based on the requirements contained in the RFP. The review of the auditors’ proposals and qualifications should be thorough, uniform, and well documented. Verify that the firm has addressed all items mentioned in your RFP. For those proposals that are complete and have addressed all relevant areas. Consider performing separate evaluations of the proposals based on technical criteria and price. While the price for the work to be performed is a factor in the selection process, the lowest price does not guarantee a quality audit. As mentioned previously, only after the technical evaluation is complete and the qualified respondents have been identified should the plan sponsor review the prices offered by the qualified respondents. Consider whether you want the finalists to present their proposals.

RFP Audit Example Template

The following RFP template contains many of the RFP criteria outlined above. It can be tailored to fit the needs of the plan sponsor conducting an evaluation of audit candidates. As always, we hope you find the tool useful in your quest for a new auditor that fits your needs.

SECTION I: INTRODUCTION
A. Nature of Request
_____________ is soliciting information from qualified firms to provide audit services for our 401(k) Retirement Plan.

  • You will be provided the most recent audited financial statements and Form 5500.
  • All of the assets of the plan are with ______________________________.
  • Our most recent audit was conducted by __________________________.
  • Last year we merged the ______________ plan and the ______________ plan.
  • The merged plan ______________ was or was not previously audited.

After post audit discussions with our 401(k) Advisors and team, we’ve decided that for the ______________ calendar year audit we will conduct an RFP to find an auditor that is best suited for our company.

B. Audit Team Contacts
During the audit, inquires and requests for information shall be directed to (include name and email address):

  • ______________________ CFO
  • ______________________ Human Resources Manager
  • ______________________ Payroll Manager
  • ______________________ Third Party Administrator
  • ______________________ Investment Advisor
SECTION II: INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING AND SUBMITTING RESPONSES
A. Schedule of Important Dates
Submission Due __________________
B. Submission of Responses
The Respondent shall submit an electronic response to the following email address___________
C. Response Format and Content
Responses should be designed so as to cover the content requirements identified within this RFP. Each response must be organized in the manner described below:

  • Transmittal Letter: The transmittal letter should briefly identify the respondent and specify that it is submitted in response to the RFP. General information should be included such as 1) the name, mailing address, phone number, fax number, and email of the firm and the primary contact; and 2) location(s) of the facility from which the respondent will operate.
  • Fee Information: Please submit a fee outline for the current year plus two additional years.
  • References: Please provide three references, preferably with plans similar to ours.
SECTION III: PROCESS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA
A. Review Process
  Our Team and our advisors will review responses submitted by respondents. One or more firms may be selected to participate in a finalist meeting. The selection will be made based on the RFP response and finalist meetings.
B. Evaluation Criteria
  Responses to this RFP may be accepted as submitted, or may be used as a basis for further requests. In evaluating responses, the team will consider the demonstrated competence, knowledge, reputation, and qualifications of the firm as a whole; the firm’s technical expertise and experience in working with corporate defined contribution plans, specifically expertise in auditing 401(k) Plans; the firm’s compatibility with ___________’s culture, and the reasonableness of the fee estimates given the services proposed.
SECTION IV: QUESTIONNAIRE – ORGANIZATION | REPUTATION | EXPERIENCE
A. Organization
  • Give a brief history of your firm’s experience including the year of organization, current ownership, and affiliations.
  • List the number of professional staff in total and the geographical area that you serve.
  • Provide details about the retirement plan audit practice.
  • Indicate how long your firm has been active in auditing Employee Benefit Plans.
  • Describe in detail the number of partners, managers, and staff that are dedicated to EBP audits.
  • Of the EBP practice, approximately how many 401(k) Plans are in your portfolio?
  • What percentage of your firm’s revenue is comprised of EBP audits?
  • What is the range in sizes of 401(k Plans that you audit? Include the number of participants and value of assets.
  • How much of your client base retains your services for EBP services only?
B. Professional Staff – Engagement Team
  List the name(s) of the individual(s) who would be directly responsible for our account and provide brief biographies including titles, functions, academic credentials, and relevant experience.
C. Education | Training | Audit Methodology
 
  • Describe how you ensure that our auditors have received current training to perform EPB audits? When does this training occur?
  • Describe your audit methodology. How is staff assigned, trained and supervised using the methodology to conduct an efficient and effective audit?
D. Timing and Communication
 
  • Describe the timeline to ensure that our audit meets or exceeds filing Form 5500 on or before October 15th.
  • Describe your communication plan to ensure you receive all the information required to perform our audit, to identify and resolve findings and exceptions timely, and to prepare information for the audit committee well in advance of the semi-annual meeting.
E. Client Satisfaction
 
  • Please provide client retention statistics for each of the last three years. For those who left, what percentage left due to issues pertaining to services provided by your organization? What is the average client relationship duration?
  • Describe your procedures for monitoring client satisfaction.
  • Describe your organization’s commitment to quality and your approach to client service.
F. Insurance and Liability
  Please describe the levels of coverage for errors and omissions insurance, and any fiduciary or professional liability insurance your firm carries. Is the coverage on a per client basis, or is the dollar figure applied to the firm as a whole.
G. Conflicts of Interest | Peer Review
  • Please affirm your independence with respect to ________________.
  • Explain any potential conflict your firm may have in servicing the Plan.
  • What procedures are in place that would identify, mitigate or eliminate potential conflicts of interest?

 

Disclaimer: This blog post is valid as of the date published.


About the Author

Director Accounting & Auditing

More Insights from Maria

© 2025 Belfint Lyons & Shuman | All Rights Reserved  | Privacy Policy | Beflint.com

Belfint Lyons Shuman is a Certified Public Accounting (CPA) firm that audits Defined contribution plans (profit-sharing, 401(k), 403(b) , 401(a), 457(b))), and Defined benefit plans (pension and cash balance), and Health and welfare plans. We serve a variety of plan sponsors including for-profit, nonprofit, governmental, and Taft-Hartley collectively-bargained plans located in Delaware, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Washington, D.C., Virginia, Massachusetts, and nationally. For additional information contact us at info@belfint.com